|
| |
Accelerating
Change
Miscellany
The Zapruder Film and
the Time Value of Money
Accelerating Change
Deja Vu
When
Alvin Toffler wrote Future Shock in 1971, it was reasonable to question
the validity of his thesis that change was taking place at an unprecedented
rate. Certainly there was great change in earlier societies. Agricultural
communities had to contend with upheavals produced by weather and pests. The
world had to confront many periods of disease and war. The industrial revolution
brought about great changes with railroads, automobiles, and electricity and
the idea of progress along with change was instilled. By the time The Third
Wave came out in 1981, the view that rapid technological transformation was
upon us and would profoundly impact the future could resonate more clearly.
People had already been to the moon and the PC revolution was starting. But was
it comparable to the transition from hunter-gatherers to agriculture and to the
industrial revolution? Was it really that revolutionary?
Recent Interpretations
In his 1999 book Business @ the Speed of Thought, Microsoft Chairman
Bill Gates observes:
"Previous economic eras were marked by long periods of stability followed
by short periods of industry-wrenching change. Evolutionists would call this
phenomenon punctuated equilibrium. Today the forces of digital
information are creating a business environment of constant change.
Evolutionists would call this punctuated chaos-constant upheaval
marked by brief respites. The pace of changes sometimes unsettling."
The theme of a new pace of change also was addressed in science writer James
Gleick's 1999 The Acceleration of Just About Everything. Barbara
Ehrenreich, reviewing the book in the September 12, 1999 New York Times Book
Review, questions the healthiness of the trend:
"Against all expectations, the collective brain that emerges from our
ever richer connectedness is turning out to be kind of dumb."
The
Superindustrial Society -- Another View
"The economy and society of the 1990s and at least the first decades of
the twenty-first century is a superindustrial society. If changes associated
with aging of the population do not obliterate its features it could
characterize developments for far longer. By superindustrial society I mean
a high-powered environment in which the basic features of the Industrial
Revolution are extended for a long time. They are extended by two
developments -- more highly automated factories and modernization of service
industries. New levels of sophistication are reached in technology, capital,
skills and management. Complex computer and communications linkages,
application of intelligent systems and other advances in technology are in
widespread use. They are extended to many other parts of the world. There is
rapid growth in the business services and in services which deal with
personal business -- financial, medical, communications, etc. This is in
marked contrast to the emphasis on leisure in notions of post-industrial
society."
Irving Leveson, American Challenges: Business and Government in
the World of the 1990s, New York: Prater Publishers, 1991, pp.47-48.
to top of page
Miscellany
"In
just one year before in the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, Adm. William Crowe,
the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had proposed eliminating the
Persian Gulf from U.S. military planning on the grounds that the Soviet
threat to the region had gone away. In the end, Secretary of Defense Richard
Cheney and Gen. Colin Powell overruled the Joint Staff and directed the
military to begin planning instead for an Iraqi threat to the Arabian
Peninsula. Yet no one expected such a threat to materialize as quickly as it
did."
Paul Wolfowitz, "A Bomber for Uncertain Times," The Wall Street
Journal (June 12, 1995), p.A12.
"Among the most profound business changes that I see occurring now and in
the decade to come is a dramatic repositioning of companies in the
marketplace. Innovative companies are using the competitive edge that the
information technologies provide to create new lines of business, enter new
markets, expand their access to existing markets and create new value-added
services that create customer loyalty. They are doing all this in a market
that is itself changing because of the technologies that are being
introduced."
William G. McGowan, Chairman and founder, MCI Communications Corporation,
"Information Age Technology--The Competitive Advantage," Views From the
Top, Jerome Rosow, ed., New York: Facts On File Publications, 1985,
p.134.
"Over a decade ago we began an era of quantum jumps in our basic
knowledge of the biosciences. The expansion of that basic knowledge is still
proceeding at an extremely rapid pace. It will have innumerable practical
consequences, some of which are now appearing and many of which will emerge
during the next century."
William E. Bonnet, futurist, in 1979 in "Two Promising Technologies:
the Biosciences and Information Sciences," Working in the
Twenty-First Century, edited by C. Stewart Sheppard and Donald C.
Carrol, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1980.
"I have always thought that if in the lamentable era of the "New
Economics," culminating in 1929, even in the presence of dizzily spiraling
prices, we had all continuously repeated "two and two still make four" much
of the evil might have been averted."
Bernard Baruch, in the introduction to the 1932 edition of Mackay's
classic Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds.
"The free-trade system is destructive. It breaks up old nationalities and
pushes the antagonisms of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie to the extreme
point. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, that I vote in favor of
free-trade."
Karl Marx, Brussels, 1848
"History doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes."
Mark Twain
to top of page
The Zapruder
Film and The Time Value of Money
On
Aug. 3, 1999 a Federal arbitration panel agreed to pay the heirs of Abraham
Zapruder $16 million for his film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.
Nearly 36 years had elapsed since the film was made on Nov. 22, 1963. The
government's original offer was $1 million. Some press reports said the
settlement split the difference between the government's offer and the $30
million which the family claimed the film was worth. How much did the Zapruder
family really get?
A quick calculation can be made using the "rule of 72". The rule
states that if you divide the growth rate (or interest rate) of something into
72 you find out how many years it takes for it to double. At an interest rate of
8%, money would double in nine years since 8x9 is 72. At 10% it would double in
seven years.
At an interest rate of 8%, the $1 million the family was offered
would be worth $2 million in 9 years, $4 million in 18 years, $8 million in 27
years and $16 million in 36 years. In other words, if the Zapruder family had
taken the million dollar offer and invested the money at 8% they would have
ended up with the same $16 million they ultimately received. While the
government might not have paid right away, they could have saved a lot in legal
fees and had the flexibility to use the money when they wanted.
If they invested the money and earned more than 8% percent per
year they might have had substantially more than the $16 million settlement. At
10% per year they would have had $2 million in seven years, $4 million in 14
years, $8 million in 21 years, $16 million in 28 years and $32 million in 35
years. In other words, under reasonable assumptions, by not taking the original
offer they could have lost half the money.
(While the film remained the government's property, the family
did retain the rights to its use during those years.)
to top of page
|